UCLA professors half as likely Stanford to say their college protects free speech

(The Center Square) – UCLA professors are less than half as likely as their Stanford counterparts to say it’s clear their university administration protects free speech, highlighting stark differences in perceived academic freedom between California’s private and public universities.

The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, a First Amendment legal nonprofit, surveyed 6,269 faculty members at 55 major colleges and universities, found at least one out of every five faculty report that they are likely to self-censor in some way, and that 55% of conservative, 35% of moderate, and 17% of liberal faculty at least occasionally hide their political beliefs from other faculty in an attempt to keep their jobs.

Professors also limit discussions on difficult topics, the survey found.

“Over the past year, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been front of mind for many,” FIRE’s report said. “Yet 70% of faculty say they have difficulty talking openly and honestly about this topic on their campus — and this approached 90% on campuses such as Columbia, Stanford, and Rutgers.”

“Many faculty also say they have difficulty talking openly about racial inequality (51%), transgender rights (49%), affirmative action (47%), and the presidential election (41%),” continued the report.

- Advertisement -

At UCLA, where violent brawls between pro-Israeli and pro-Palestinian mobs garnered national attention, 78% of 123 surveyed faculty said the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was the most difficult issue to talk about on campus, followed by transgender rights (51%) and racial inequality (47%).

Sixty-five percent of UCLA faculty who took the survey described themselves as liberal, 16% as moderate, and 16% as conservative. Forty-seven percent also said diversity, equity, and inclusion statement pledges in hiring that articulate a prospective hire’s understanding of DEI in higher education, personal DEI action examples, and future plans to advance DEI, are “never” or “rarely” justifiable. Forty-three percent of UCLA faculty also said it’s not at all or not very clear that the administration protects free speech on campus.

That’s a sharp contrast to professors at Stanford, only 18% of whom say it’s unclear whether the administration protects free speech. Of the 59 surveyed Stanford professors, 68% said DEI statement pledges in hiring are never or rarely acceptable. 71% of surveyed Stanford professors described themselves as liberal, 14% as moderate, and 14% as conservative.

Eighty-seven percent of Stanford professors said the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was one of the top three most difficult issues to talk about on campus, followed by affirmative action at 55% and racial inequality at 53%.

The Stanford-UCLA divergence in support for DEI statement pledges in hiring is notable in that the California constitution has an explicit ban on discrimination or preferential treatment on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, education, and contracting. This includes a ban on affirmative action in state universities, and preferential treatment of anyone in higher education on the basis of race or other protected classes.

spot_img
spot_img

Hot this week

Health care company agrees to pay $22.5 million to settle claims of over billing

A health care company agreed to pay nearly $22.5...

Business association ‘disappointed’ by WA L&I’s proposed workers comp rate hike

(The Center Square) – The Association of Washington Business...

Sports betting bill still alive in Georgia House

(The Center Square) – A bill that would allow...

Sports betting expert offers advice on paying taxes for gambling winnings

(The Center Square) – Tax season is underway, and...

African and Caribbean Nations Call for Reparations for Slave Trade, Propose Global Fund

Nations across Africa and the Caribbean, deeply impacted by...

WATCH: ‘Waters Edge’ tax breaks would end if California bill passes

Editor's note: This story has been updated since its...

Texas sheriff proposes bipartisan solution to border issue

(The Center Square) – As Congress debates Department of...

Wisconsin red tape reset will be heard by Senate on Wednesday

(The Center Square) – A group of three bills...

Seattle’s FIFA World Cup 2026 windfall: Opportunities and risks

(The Center Square) – There is no doubt that...

GOP says housing bills miss chance for immediate cost relief

(The Center Square) – Housing bills advanced by Democrats...

Pittsburgh OKs $7M for vehicle fleet upgrades after property tax hike

(The Center Square) – Pittsburgh residents who swallowed a...

Tropicana Field approved for $16.5M taxpayer-funded repayment

(The Center Square) – Federal taxpayer funds will be...

More like this
Related

WATCH: ‘Waters Edge’ tax breaks would end if California bill passes

Editor's note: This story has been updated since its...

Texas sheriff proposes bipartisan solution to border issue

(The Center Square) – As Congress debates Department of...

‘Very selfish’: EU sanctions on Russia fertilizer will weaken U.S., food security

(The Center Square) – Sanctions the European Union is...

Wisconsin red tape reset will be heard by Senate on Wednesday

(The Center Square) – A group of three bills...