Federal appeals court hears challenge to Illinois gun and magazine bans

(The Center Square) – Whether Illinois’ gun and magazine bans are constitutional is now up to a federal appeals court.

The consolidated cases challenging state and local gun and magazine bans in Illinois were heard Thursday by a three-judge panel of the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.

Defendants asked the court to affirm the Northern District Court upholding the bans while reversing a Southern District Court injunction against the law.

Using U.S. Supreme Court precedent from an opinion released last year, plaintiffs argue the gun ban violates the Second Amendment plain text and there’s no history or tradition of governments banning commonly owned firearms like AR-15s and magazines over 10 rounds for rifles and 15 rounds for handguns.

Illinois Deputy Solicitor General Sarah Hunger argued Thursday that the bans on semi-automatic firearms are constitutional.

- Advertisement -

“Assault weapons are virtually identical weapons to M-16s but for one thing, which is that M-16s can use automatic fire instead of semi-automatic fire and sure that is a distinction but it is not one that is constitutionally determinative,” Hunger said.

While the defense said the banned firearms are dangerous and unusual, plaintiffs argued that’s not the case.

Judge Frank Easterbrook asked plaintiffs’ attorney Thomas Maag why bazookas can’t be considered arms.

“In your view, is the stinger missile protected by the Second Amendment,” Easterbrook asked.

“Probably not because it would be dangerous and unusual,” Maag said.

“Unusual compared to what,” Easterbrook asked.

- Advertisement -

“Compared to anything,” Maag said. “Even in the military, they don’t issue manned portable air defense systems like a stinger missile to the average infantryman.”

Part of the state law requires individuals who own any of the banned firearms before the law was enacted on Jan. 10, 2023, to register them with Illinois State Police by Jan. 1, 2024, or face criminal penalties. It could be months before a ruling is issued. Whatever the decision, it’s expected the case will go to the U.S. Supreme Court.

spot_img
spot_img

Hot this week

Health care company agrees to pay $22.5 million to settle claims of over billing

A health care company agreed to pay nearly $22.5...

African and Caribbean Nations Call for Reparations for Slave Trade, Propose Global Fund

Nations across Africa and the Caribbean, deeply impacted by...

Sports betting expert offers advice on paying taxes for gambling winnings

(The Center Square) – Tax season is underway, and...

Business association ‘disappointed’ by WA L&I’s proposed workers comp rate hike

(The Center Square) – The Association of Washington Business...

Entertainment district benefits don’t outweigh the cost, economists say

(The Center Square) — Weeks later, after more details...

Arctic cutters pact led by Louisiana shipbuilder

(The Center Square) − Louisiana-based Bollinger Shipyards has been...

Govt shutdown raises concerns over national security

(The Center Square) - As partisan divides appear to...

$4.5B awarded in new contracts to build Smart Wall along southwest border

Roughly $4.5 billion in contracts have been awarded to...

Grant of $10,000 to continue beautification of airport entryway

(The Center Square) – Upgrades to the Shreveport Regional...

Ex-speaker Madigan to begin 7.5-year prison sentence Monday

(The Center Square) – One day before the Illinois...

Trump snubbed by Nobel Committee, praised by winner

After being credited for ending seven wars, President Donald...

More like this
Related

Arctic cutters pact led by Louisiana shipbuilder

(The Center Square) − Louisiana-based Bollinger Shipyards has been...

Govt shutdown raises concerns over national security

(The Center Square) - As partisan divides appear to...

Do No Harm expects FTC to take action to protect minors from transgender procedures

(The Center Square ) – After submitting comments to...