Illinois gun ban challenges could be next up for SCOTUS

(The Center Square) – Challenges to local and state gun bans in Illinois could be the next case in front of the U.S. Supreme court on the “AR-15 issue.”

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a challenge to Maryland’s ban, The Center Square reported. In the order, Justice Brett Kavanaugh said whether a state can ban an AR-15 is a question he expects the court to take up, but not right now.

“Although the Court today denies certiorari, a denial of certiorari does not mean that the Court agrees with a lower-court decision or that the issue is not worthy of review,” Kavanaugh wrote.

Arguing the U.S. Supreme Court should have taken the Maryland case, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote AR-15s are arms protected by the Second Amendment.

“Tens of millions of Americans own AR–15s, and the ‘overwhelming majority’ of them ‘do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting,’” Thomas wrote. “Our Constitution allows the American people – not the government – to decide which weapons are useful for self-defense.”

- Advertisement -

Second Amendment Foundation’s Alan Gottlieb said the justices had a full docket this term but is confident the issue will be addressed.

“I really like what the Supreme Court justices [had] written,” Gottlieb told The Center Square Tuesday. “That’s why I have really good faith that they’re going to take another case … The question is when. They really overloaded this session and it’s a real problem.”

Kavanaugh noted several other cases pending in the federal appeals courts, including a case challenging Cook County and Illinois’ ban. Gottlieb is a plaintiff in Viramontes v. Cook County.

“It’s a great possibility that can be one that gets to the Supreme Court or another case out of Illinois, because there are so many of them,” he said. “They’re already even ahead of schedule on that one. It’s very likely an Illinois case is what the Supreme Court will hear.”

Monday, the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s ruling in favor of the state and the county, queuing the Viramontes case for a possible appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Southern District case where a judge found the state’s gun ban unconstitutional is pending in the appeals courts with plaintiffs scheduled to file their reply brief Friday.

spot_img
spot_img

Hot this week

African and Caribbean Nations Call for Reparations for Slave Trade, Propose Global Fund

Nations across Africa and the Caribbean, deeply impacted by...

Sports betting expert offers advice on paying taxes for gambling winnings

(The Center Square) – Tax season is underway, and...

Health care company agrees to pay $22.5 million to settle claims of over billing

A health care company agreed to pay nearly $22.5...

Entertainment district benefits don’t outweigh the cost, economists say

(The Center Square) — Weeks later, after more details...

Business association ‘disappointed’ by WA L&I’s proposed workers comp rate hike

(The Center Square) – The Association of Washington Business...

White House: Taxpayers spent $56 billion on improper Medicaid claims

(The Center Square) – Taxpayers spent $56 billion on...

Texas DPS arrests 9 in anti-ICE protest in Austin, including GOP lt. gov. candidate

(The Center Square) – Texas Department of Public Safety...

Democratic primary sets stage for statewide matchups in Virginia

(The Center Square) – Former Del. Jay Jones secured...

Trump shifts Greenland to U.S. Northern Command

President Donald Trump ordered the Pentagon to move Greenland...

This Day in History: Tuskegee Boycott Begins in 1957 Over Voter Suppression

On June 17, 1957, the Tuskegee Boycott began. In...

Wisconsin Supreme Court rules AG doesn’t need legislative settlement approval

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin’s Supreme Court ruled unanimously...

More like this
Related