(The Center Square) − The Louisiana Task Force on the Regulation of Community-Based Residential Settings is refining its recommendations for greater oversight of rental properties.
The proposal would require local municipalities to register and regulate these residences, creating a database with details such as floor plans, occupancy limits, lease agreements, and adherence to sanitary and fire codes.
During their latest work group session, task force members raised significant concerns regarding the legal, logistical, and privacy implications of the proposal.
A major debate centered on whether rental group homes can legally be subject to regulations not applied to all residential rentals, with some members cautioning that such requirements could violate the Fair Housing Act by discriminating against people with disabilities.
One participant suggested that occupancy limits should not be determined solely by square footage but also by available parking spaces.
“We have issues with residents parking up and down the street, blocking bike lanes and creating congestion,” Debra Simino from the Baton Rouge Civic Associations said. “The number of residents should be limited to the number of parking spaces in the driveway.”
Monique Blossom from the Louisiana Fair Housing Action Center pointed out that parking regulations vary by municipality and zoning laws.
“If parking requirements are included, they should align with local regulations since these differ from neighborhood to neighborhood,” she advised.
Clarification was also sought on what qualifies as “unlicensed community housing.”
Unlike licensed adult residential care facilities that provide medical services, these homes operate independently, raising questions about oversight and classification.
To avoid potential violations of fair housing laws, one member suggested making registration voluntary unless all rental properties were required to comply with the same regulations.
“If registration, floor plan submission, and other requirements apply only to group homes, that would be discriminatory,” Blossom warned.
Although three recommendations were set for discussion, the task force only managed to address the first, underscoring the complexity of the issue. Further public input is expected before the final proposal is crafted.