Poll: Majority of Massachusetts voters oppose using public funds to house migrants

(The Center Square) – Massachusetts voters don’t like the idea of state officials using public funds to house migrants, according to a new poll.

Over 50% of nearly eight hundred voters surveyed oppose using tax dollars to support newly arrived migrants, according to a recent poll conducted by the Fiscal Alliance Foundation.

Over 65% of respondents don’t believe Massachusetts can accommodate more migrants arriving in the commonwealth.

Massachusetts is the only state with a “right to shelter” law, which requires temporary housing for desperate families; however, the law does not apply to individuals.

The poll comes as state lawmakers are dealing with a growing immigration crisis and debating potential solutions. Gov. Maura Healey is considering funding a new program to assist roughly 400 migrants for one year. The program would fund various agencies, such as the International Institute of New England, which supports migrants.

- Advertisement -

The move would require $8 million from the state’s supplemental budget. Healey recently requested an additional $250 million in funds to deal with the crisis, which her administration estimates could ultimately cost taxpayers nearly $1 billion next year.

The governor is also working to allow the new migrants to work. “Almost all of the new arrivals here in the state, they all want to work,” Healey’s office told NBC10. “We’ve been able to process them for work authorizations and now we’re in the process of getting them plugged in with employers throughout the state.”

Some officials are even discussing changing the “right to shelter” law in response to a growing emergency shelter waitlist, which reached over 700 as of Feb. 12.

“You know, no one certainly, no one predicted the immigration crisis that we have in America,” said Sen. John Velis, D-Hampden, according to Spectrum News.

“Times have changed, and now we don’t have the federal government’s help. So I don’t think it’s a question of keeping or repealing ‘Right to Shelter,’ but I think it’s absolutely a question of modifying ‘Right to Shelter’ to account for the new reality that’s out there.”

spot_img
spot_img

Hot this week

Health care company agrees to pay $22.5 million to settle claims of over billing

A health care company agreed to pay nearly $22.5...

African and Caribbean Nations Call for Reparations for Slave Trade, Propose Global Fund

Nations across Africa and the Caribbean, deeply impacted by...

Sports betting expert offers advice on paying taxes for gambling winnings

(The Center Square) – Tax season is underway, and...

Business association ‘disappointed’ by WA L&I’s proposed workers comp rate hike

(The Center Square) – The Association of Washington Business...

Entertainment district benefits don’t outweigh the cost, economists say

(The Center Square) — Weeks later, after more details...

Arctic cutters pact led by Louisiana shipbuilder

(The Center Square) − Louisiana-based Bollinger Shipyards has been...

Govt shutdown raises concerns over national security

(The Center Square) - As partisan divides appear to...

$4.5B awarded in new contracts to build Smart Wall along southwest border

Roughly $4.5 billion in contracts have been awarded to...

Grant of $10,000 to continue beautification of airport entryway

(The Center Square) – Upgrades to the Shreveport Regional...

Ex-speaker Madigan to begin 7.5-year prison sentence Monday

(The Center Square) – One day before the Illinois...

Trump snubbed by Nobel Committee, praised by winner

After being credited for ending seven wars, President Donald...

More like this
Related

Arctic cutters pact led by Louisiana shipbuilder

(The Center Square) − Louisiana-based Bollinger Shipyards has been...

Govt shutdown raises concerns over national security

(The Center Square) - As partisan divides appear to...

Do No Harm expects FTC to take action to protect minors from transgender procedures

(The Center Square ) – After submitting comments to...