Judge delays decision on Trump’s hush money case

(The Center Square) – A New York judge delayed a Tuesday decision on the dismissal of President-elect Donald Trump’s hush money conviction after the U.S. Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling and Trump’s election win last week.

At the request of prosecutors and defense attorneys, Judge Juan Merchan hit pause on the court calendar for a week while prosecutors decide how to proceed after Trump’s win over Vice President Kamala Harris last Tuesday.

Merchan agreed to freeze the case until Nov. 19, according to court records posted Tuesday. That gives prosecutors more time to respond to Trump’s request the case be dismissed entirely after his election win.

“The stay, and dismissal, are necessary to avoid unconstitutional impediments to President Trump’s ability to govern,” Trump attorney Emil Bove wrote in an email to the judge.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office agreed to delay the proceedings while it assesses how to respond to Trump’s request for dismissal.

- Advertisement -

“The People agree that these are unprecedented circumstances and that the arguments raised by defense counsel in correspondence to the People on Friday require careful consideration,” prosecutor Matthew Colangelo wrote to the judge.

Merchan – who had already delayed Trump’s sentencing for several months ahead of the election – was set to decide Tuesday if Trump’s conviction stands after the U.S. Supreme Court’s immunity decision in July.

After the high court’s decision, Trump’s defense team had asked Merchan to dismiss the case. Bragg’s office argued that the ruling from the nation’s highest court is unrelated to Trump’s conviction on charges that he illegally paid hush money to keep women quiet about alleged sexual encounters and then covered up the payments as legal expenses during his 2016 campaign.

The judge said that if Trump’s dismissal motion fails, “the law requires the imposition of sentence following a guilty verdict without unreasonable delay.”

Prosecutors said they are trying to balance Trump’s next term in the White House with the jury’s verdict in the case.

“The People agree that these are unprecedented circumstances and that the arguments raised by defense counsel in correspondence … require careful consideration to ensure that any further steps in this proceeding appropriately balance (1) a jury verdict of guilt following trial that has presumption of regularity and (2) the Office of the President,” prosecutors Michael Colangelo wrote.

- Advertisement -

Prosecutors said they will decide how to proceed by Nov. 19.

In late May, a Manhattan jury convicted Trump on all counts in his hush money case. Trump was convicted of 34 counts of falsifying business records for disguising hush money payments to an adult film actress as legal costs ahead of the 2016 election. Under New York state law, falsifying business records in the first degree is a Class E felony with a maximum sentence of four years in prison.

In July, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that presidents and former presidents have absolute immunity for actions related to core constitutional powers and presumptive immunity for official actions. The ruling said the president has no immunity for unofficial conduct.

spot_img
spot_img

Hot this week

Health care company agrees to pay $22.5 million to settle claims of over billing

A health care company agreed to pay nearly $22.5...

Business association ‘disappointed’ by WA L&I’s proposed workers comp rate hike

(The Center Square) – The Association of Washington Business...

Sports betting bill still alive in Georgia House

(The Center Square) – A bill that would allow...

Sports betting expert offers advice on paying taxes for gambling winnings

(The Center Square) – Tax season is underway, and...

Men of Color Expo – Celebrating Men of Excellence

Tinker Federal Credit Union & PPBC Present Men of Color...

Mont. SC won’t halt plan to stop businesses’ political spending

The Montana Supreme Court has dismissed a challenge by...

Group hails Missouri SC redistricting, voter ID rulings

A Missouri political advocacy organization is praising recent rulings...

Michigan gas prices dip, drivers still feel the strain

(The Center Square) – Michigan’s gas prices dipped slightly...

Bellows criticized over ‘misleading’ ballot question wording

(The Center Square) — Backers of a Maine referendum...

Op-Ed: For lower electricity prices, build baby build

Americans are fed up with five years of sharply...

Kansas legislature overrides Kelly veto on ‘lawfare’ bill, limiting public nuisance lawsuits

(The Center Square) – Kansas lawmakers overrode Democratic Gov....

Illinois Quick Hits: $3M in taxpayer funds go to Chicago neighborhood center

(The Center Square) – Illinois taxpayers have provided $3...

Supreme Court of Georgia to hear chemical fire case

(The Center Square) – The Supreme Court of Georgia...

More like this
Related

Mont. SC won’t halt plan to stop businesses’ political spending

The Montana Supreme Court has dismissed a challenge by...

Group hails Missouri SC redistricting, voter ID rulings

A Missouri political advocacy organization is praising recent rulings...

Michigan gas prices dip, drivers still feel the strain

(The Center Square) – Michigan’s gas prices dipped slightly...

Bellows criticized over ‘misleading’ ballot question wording

(The Center Square) — Backers of a Maine referendum...