California Democrats move forward bill to chip away historic water rights

(The Center Square) – The California Assembly Committee on Water, Parks, and Wildlife today passed a bill out of committee that would empower the State Water Board to chip away at historic water rights and significantly reduce rural water allocations. Under SB 389, sponsored by Ben Allen (D-Redondo Beach), the California State Water Resources Control Board and its five appointed members would be able to review historic riparian and appropriative water rights to determine whether or not they are appropriate.

Already passed by the California Senate, the bill’s affirmative vote in committee is a strong sign the bill may become law. The main targets of the bill are holders of pre-1914 water rights who secured their water rights before a formal permitting and records process was adopted. By challenging water rights holders to provide exhaustive paper trails proving their rights’ legality and complete adherence to “beneficial use,” the State Water Board would effectively hold riparian and appropriative water rights holders guilty-until-proven-innocent, with their water, and their livelihoods, on the line at the board’s discretion.

“It gives a clear mandate to the State Water Board to start reviewing and determining whether these riparian and appropriative rights are appropriate,” said Nick Dokoozlian, a California Assembly Republican Caucus consultant covering the bill. “Their end goal is to upend the California water rights system to benefit favored political groups through unelected bureaucrats.”

Amid significant opposition from a broad coalition ranging from water districts that provide water to big cities, all the way to California farmers, bill author Senator Ben Allen (D-Redondo Beach) painted the law in a different light, focusing on how this bill is designed to ensure the State Water Board has the data it needs to best manage future droughts.

In his official statement on the bill, Allen said, “SB 389 provides information-gathering tools that allow the State Water Board to align a watershed’s reported demand with the diversions and use authorized under California law, thus more accurately determining water availability for all beneficial uses.

spot_img
spot_img

Hot this week

Health care company agrees to pay $22.5 million to settle claims of over billing

A health care company agreed to pay nearly $22.5...

Business association ‘disappointed’ by WA L&I’s proposed workers comp rate hike

(The Center Square) – The Association of Washington Business...

Sports betting bill still alive in Georgia House

(The Center Square) – A bill that would allow...

Sports betting expert offers advice on paying taxes for gambling winnings

(The Center Square) – Tax season is underway, and...

Men of Color Expo – Celebrating Men of Excellence

Tinker Federal Credit Union & PPBC Present Men of Color...

Sewage, waterboard proposal strips universities from nomination role

(The Center Square) − A substitute version of Rep....

Lawmakers push back against ‘blank check for warrantless surveillance’

(The Center Square) – Ahead of a scheduled House...

Two of ComEd Four released. new trial pending

(The Center Square) – A U.S. appellate court has...

Report says Arizona lost 15,000 jobs in 2025

(The Center Square)- A new report shows Arizona lost...

Op-Ed: Delinking legislation is a price control in disguise

You may have seen Pharmaceutical Benefit Managers (PBMs) in...

Bad River Band gets another hearing to stop Line 5 reroute Thursday

(The Center Square) - The Bad River Band of...

Bill that could shutter low-performing virtual schools passes House

(The Center Square) – The Tennessee House of Representatives...

More like this
Related

Sewage, waterboard proposal strips universities from nomination role

(The Center Square) − A substitute version of Rep....

Lawmakers push back against ‘blank check for warrantless surveillance’

(The Center Square) – Ahead of a scheduled House...

Two of ComEd Four released. new trial pending

(The Center Square) – A U.S. appellate court has...