Citizen-led initiative declared legally invalid at Vancouver City Council meeting

(The Center Square) – The Vancouver City Council is not putting a citizen-led initiative on a future ballot, with city officials having declared the initiative to remove traffic lanes from city streets to be legally invalid. The initiative seeks voter approval to remove traffic lanes from city streets.

“This initiative simply asks the city to ask the residents to vote,” Save Vancouver Streets, the organization behind the initiative, states on its website.

Supporters of the initiative claim that the city does not otherwise allow for public input for the removal of travel lanes, which hinder commuters, they say.

The measure garnered more than 6,500 signatures, which is in excess of the 4,270 needed for the measure to be certified and sent to the city council for approval.

According to a press release from the city, the proposed initiative was rejected because it conflicts with state law and city charter by interfering with the legislative and administrative authority of the city council, impedes the Washington Growth Management Act, and violates Vancouver city charter that initiated ordinances shall not have more than one subject.

- Advertisement -

During Monday night’s city council meeting, 57 people testified during the public hearing period, but the city council ultimately decided to not take action on the proposed ordinance after receiving recommendations to take no action by the city attorney and city manager.

Vancouver City Manager Lon Pluckhahn advised the city council not to approve the proposed initiative to be placed on a future ballot as a result.

“If I advised otherwise, it would be asking the city council to proceed with an action that the best available information tells me is illegal,” Pluckhahn said during the city council meeting. “To move forward with the initiative as it was presented is a significant risk to the city.”

A city manager staff report regarding the proposed initiative cites the fact that Washington courts have recognized that a legally invalid initiative on the ballot amounts to a waste of taxpayer resources.

The Save Vancouver Streets group stated on its website that the city council’s decision was not unexpected. The grassroots group declared that it will move into a legal challenge phase.

Jackson Maynard, a lawyer representing Save Vancouver Streets, said the city council does not have the power to reject the initiative and prevent it from going to the ballot.

- Advertisement -

He cited section 10.08 of the city charter, which states that the proposed ordinance shall be submitted to voters at the next general election.

“The staff analysis does cite the cases in which parties have challenged invalid initiatives, but all of those are initiated in court, not from the city council,” Maynard told the city council.

Vancouver City Attorney Jonathan Young countered that the ordinance falls under section 10.04, rather than section 10.08. Section 10.04 entails the first review by the city clerk evaluating whether or not the bill has legal sufficiency.

Young added that it is outside of the city attorney’s role to advise community members on the best course of action to have the initiative be legally valid.

“The city understands that there may be legal action to place the initiative on the ballot – if that occurs, the city looks forward to the courts resolving this issue,” the city wrote in a statement.

Hot this week

African and Caribbean Nations Call for Reparations for Slave Trade, Propose Global Fund

Nations across Africa and the Caribbean, deeply impacted by...

Sports betting expert offers advice on paying taxes for gambling winnings

(The Center Square) – Tax season is underway, and...

Health care company agrees to pay $22.5 million to settle claims of over billing

A health care company agreed to pay nearly $22.5...

Entertainment district benefits don’t outweigh the cost, economists say

(The Center Square) — Weeks later, after more details...

Business association ‘disappointed’ by WA L&I’s proposed workers comp rate hike

(The Center Square) – The Association of Washington Business...

Report questions utility of Trump’s steel tariffs

(The Center Square) – President Donald Trump’s unilateral tariffs...

Fuel prices absorb tariff talk spike, volatility

(The Center Square) – Fuel prices in North Carolina...

Minimum wage deal pending, set to increase to $12.48 Friday

(The Center Square) – A last-minute legislative compromise on...

Annual statewide audit reveals billions in questioned costs and mismanagement

(The Center Square) − The Louisiana Legislative Auditor’s latest...

Illinoisans can nominate and choose coolest products made in the state

(The Center Square) – Nominations are now being accepted...

Report: Mental health funding skips high-need areas

(The Center Square) - California’s mental health funding skips...

King Soopers strike continues as company calls for an agreement

(The Center Square) – The workers strike at King...

Sandhills transformer facility expansion aided by performance grant

(The Center Square) – North Carolina’s Commerce Department is...

More like this
Related

Report questions utility of Trump’s steel tariffs

(The Center Square) – President Donald Trump’s unilateral tariffs...

Fuel prices absorb tariff talk spike, volatility

(The Center Square) – Fuel prices in North Carolina...

Minimum wage deal pending, set to increase to $12.48 Friday

(The Center Square) – A last-minute legislative compromise on...

Annual statewide audit reveals billions in questioned costs and mismanagement

(The Center Square) − The Louisiana Legislative Auditor’s latest...