How a federal court ruling could impact Washington’s natural gas ban

(The Center Square) – The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has denied a request to rehear a case in which the court overturned a city of Berkeley, Calif. ordinance restricting the use of natural gas in new construction. For opponents of new code regulations imposed by the Washington State Building Code Council, it’s a sign that their efforts to overturn it could prevail.

It’s the latest in a series of political chess moves between two opposing groups regarding the future use of natural gas in new residential and commercial buildings.

A year ago, the SBCC approved new code updates that mandated the use of heat pumps in new constructions, effectively a ban on natural gas. Heat pumps are highly energy efficient but cost more to install, a factor many building advocates say would contribute to increased home costs if required. The Building Industry Association of Washington and several other plaintiffs – shortly after the SBCC vote – filed a federal lawsuit, claiming it exceeded the council’s statutory authority.

Several months later, the 9th Circuit Court ruled against Berkeley on the basis that the Energy Policy and Conservation Act preempts state and local entities from regulating energy use of natural gas appliances.

In response, the SBCC voted to delay implementation of its new code to make updates in response to the ruling, while BIAW dropped its lawsuit. A separate group also filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, but it was voluntarily dismissed in August.

- Advertisement -

Although it has yet to decide whether to file a lawsuit, BIAW argued in a press release statement that SBCC’s latest code updates approved late last year and set to take effect on March 15 still do not comply with the EPCA.

“The SBCC said they delayed code implementation to develop updated codes that wouldn’t violate EPCA,” BIAW General Counsel Ashli Tagoai said in a press release statement. “Then they adopted code modifications that continue to violate federal law by making it so cost-prohibitive to use natural gas they’re essentially banning its use.”

spot_img
spot_img

Hot this week

Health care company agrees to pay $22.5 million to settle claims of over billing

A health care company agreed to pay nearly $22.5...

Business association ‘disappointed’ by WA L&I’s proposed workers comp rate hike

(The Center Square) – The Association of Washington Business...

Sports betting expert offers advice on paying taxes for gambling winnings

(The Center Square) – Tax season is underway, and...

African and Caribbean Nations Call for Reparations for Slave Trade, Propose Global Fund

Nations across Africa and the Caribbean, deeply impacted by...

Sports betting bill still alive in Georgia House

(The Center Square) – A bill that would allow...

Property taxes eyed to eliminate Georgia income taxes

(The Center Square) – In Georgia, state income taxes...

Colorado spends $10.5M on outdoor equity grants since 2022

(The Center Square) – Colorado has spent millions of...

Medical school OKs $10M religious discrimination settlement

(The Center Square) – The University of Colorado Anschutz...

Wisconsin lawmakers push for tobacco sale age to move to 21

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin remains one of just...

Spokane requests climate exemption to avoid $8M annual fine, utility rate hikes

(The Center Square) – Facing $8 million in penalties,...

Spanberger names new transportation secretary

(The Center Square) – Nick Donohue will serve as...

Nuclear verdicts land Texas on Judicial Hellhole Watch List 

The American Tort Reform Foundation has placed Texas on...

More like this
Related

Property taxes eyed to eliminate Georgia income taxes

(The Center Square) – In Georgia, state income taxes...

Colorado spends $10.5M on outdoor equity grants since 2022

(The Center Square) – Colorado has spent millions of...

Medical school OKs $10M religious discrimination settlement

(The Center Square) – The University of Colorado Anschutz...